Dersin Ayrıntıları
YarıyılKoduAdıT+U+LKrediAKTS
3PSIR223History of Political Thought3+0+036

Dersin Detayları
Dersin Dili İngilizce
Dersin Düzeyi Lisans
Bölümü / Programı Siyaset Bilimi ve Uluslararası İlişkiler (İngilizce)
Öğrenim Türü Örgün Öğretim
Dersin Türü Zorunlu
Dersin Amacı What is political thought or political philosophy? It simply looks like a branch of political science. One could argue that political thought is yet another subfield of political science just like Turkish politics, international relations, or comparative politics. However, as its purpose is to lay bare the fundamental problems, concepts, and categories which frame the study of politics, political thought is actually the oldest and most fundamental part of political science. In this respect, it constitutes the foundation of the entire discipline. Without grasping the stakes involved in the history of political thought, students of politics could adopt shallow and reductionist positions with respect to contemporary politics.
When it is interpreted as the study of the great books or great thinkers of the past, political thought could easily degenerate into a kind of antiquarianism, which risks overlooking the issues of our contemporary world. Students of political science study the classical texts of political thought because they provide us with the most basic questions that continue to guide our field. They remain in many ways constitutive of our most basic outlooks and attitudes regarding the deepest problems of political life. They provide us with a repository of fundamental questions that political scientists still continue to rely on in their work. Among the great thinkers, however, there is profound disagreement over the answers to even the most fundamental questions of political science concerning justice, politics, morality, liberty, and so on and so forth and it is precisely this disagreement that makes it possible for us to enter into their conversation.
This course has a double focus. It attempts to convey to undergraduate students the content of the political ideas of some leading thinkers in the history of western political philosophy. It also tries to relate this content to the historical context from which these ideas emerged. Taking Şerif Mardin’s course on ‘political thought’ at the Sabancı University in 2006 as a model, this course features political concepts and ideas in relation to their context. Instead of representing the tradition of western political philosophy as a series of ‘great ideas’ by canonical figures, we shall ‘recontextualize’ the history of political ideas within their historical (economic, social, political, intellectual) framework.
The fact that we have uncovered the historical “embeddedness” of a theory does not preclude us from questioning the internal logic of this theory. Nonetheless, the importance of western political thinkers does not only consist in cogency of their views, but also in their historical meaning. To give an example, we will discuss Plato’s idea of the ‘philosopher king’ as a critique of the Athenian democracy which was, at that time, on the brink of collapse after the end of the Peloponnesian war. Likewise, we will examine the concept of the ‘tyranny of majority’ of Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill in relation to the liberal critique of the emerging modern democracy in Europe and the United States. With this contextual approach, students will grasp the organic relationship between political ideas and political history.
Dersin İçeriği Students are required to do the assigned readings and to participate in class discussions every week. Assigned and additional readings involve both an introductory text on the related subject and selected parts from the canonical books of western political philosophy.
Dersin Yöntem ve Teknikleri Readings and discussions.
Ön Koşulları Yok
Dersin Koordinatörü Yok
Dersi Verenler Dr. Öğretim Üyesi Ahmet Özcan
Dersin Yardımcıları Yok
Dersin Staj Durumu Yok

Ders Kaynakları
Kaynaklar McClelland, James S. A History of Western Political Thought. London: Routledge, 1996.
Strauss, Leo, and Joseph Cropsey (eds.). History of Political Philosophy. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987.
McClelland, James S. A History of Western Political Thought. London: Routledge, 1996.

Ders Yapısı
Sosyal Bilimler %100

Planlanan Öğrenme Aktiviteleri ve Metodları
Etkinlikler ayrıntılı olarak "Değerlendirme" ve "İş Yükü Hesaplaması" bölümlerinde verilmiştir.

Değerlendirme Ölçütleri
Yarıyıl Çalışmaları Sayısı Katkı
Ara Sınav 1 % 40
Ödev 4 % 20
Yarıyıl Sonu Sınavı 1 % 40
Toplam :
6
% 100

 
AKTS Hesaplama İçeriği
Etkinlik Sayısı Süre Toplam İş Yükü (Saat)
Ders Süresi 14 3 42
Sınıf Dışı Ç. Süresi 14 3 42
Ödevler 4 6 24
Ara Sınavlar 1 20 20
Yarıyıl Sonu Sınavı 1 20 20
Toplam İş Yükü   AKTS Kredisi : 6 148

Dersin Öğrenme Çıktıları: Bu dersin başarılı bir şekilde tamamlanmasıyla öğrenciler şunları yapabileceklerdir:
Sıra NoAçıklama
1 Identify the fundamental concepts in the history of political thought
2 Identify the evolution of political theories from the ancient to the modern world
3 Evaluate contemporary political theories in a historical and comparative perspective
4 Evaluate contemporary political theories in a historical and comparative perspective
5 Acquires an arsenal of concepts and theories to evaluate contemporary politics


Ders Konuları
HaftaKonuÖn HazırlıkDökümanlar
1 WHAT IS POLITICAL THOUGHT IN THE CONTEXT OF THE GREEKS In this introductory lecture, the nature and scope of political thought are discussed in the context of the ancient Greeks. As the study of political philosophy, the oldest of the social sciences, must begin with the works of Plato and Aristotle, it is necessary to lay bare the historical context of the origins of political philosophy. Thus, we need to address the question “Who are the ancient Greeks?” Assigned Reading: • Thucydides, “Pericles’ Funeral Oration” (in The Peloponnesian War) • McClelland, “Ancient Greek Political Thought”, pp. 4?16. Additional Reading: • Friedrich Nietzsche, “On the Prejudices of Philosophers”, Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Marion Faber. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, Sections 1?6, pp. 5?9.
2 SOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP As opposed to the poetic tradition of Homer, Socrates represented a philosophical citizenship, which relies on one’s own independent reason and judgement. Posing the questions “which regimes are best?” and “what constitutes good citizenship”, we shall focus on Socrates’ defense of the utility of philosophy for political life by analyzing his famous dictum “the unexamined life is not worth living”. Assigned Readings: • Plato, Apology. • Plato, Crito. Additional Reading: • Friedrich Nietzsche, “The Problem of Socrates”, Twilight of the Idols, trans. Antony M. Ludovici. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 2007, pp. 11?16.
3 PLATO: WHAT IS JUSTICE? This lecture introduces Plato’s The Republic, one of the oldest and greatest works in the history of political thought. Plato’s conceptualization of justice as harmony in the city and the soul is examined via Socrates’ famous thesis that all virtues require knowledge and reflection at their basis. The Republic is discussed as a political utopia. Examining Plato’s classification of political regimes, the structure and nature of his ideal state, and his famous idea of the philosopher king, it is questioned whether Plato’s utopia has the potential to turn into a dystopia. Assigned Reading: • Plato, The Republic. (Selected parts) • Thucydides, “The Melian Dialogue” (in The Peloponnesian War) Additional Readings: • McClelland, “Socrates and Plato”, pp. 17?29; “The Guardians of the State and Justice”, pp. 31-49. • Strauss, “Plato”, in Strauss and Cropsey (eds.), pp. 33?89.
4 ARISTOTLE’S POLITICAL SCIENCE Concentrating on Aristotle’s The Politics, this lecture examines Aristotle’s view on the naturalness of the city by analyzing his claim that “man is a political animal”. As he believes that it is precisely the regime that gives a people and a city their identity, Aristotle’s classification of political regimes is examined, while particularly focusing on his criticism of democracy. Assigned Reading: • Aristotle, The Politics (Selected parts) Additional Reading: • McClelland, “Aristotle and the Science of Politics”, pp. 51-68.
5 NICCOLÓ MACHIAVELLI AND THE SCHOOL OF POWER This lecture begins with an introduction of Machiavelli’s life and the political context in Renaissance Florence. Revolutionizing the field of political morality, Machiavelli proposes his own definitions of virtue and vice, replacing the vocabulary associated with Plato and Christian sources. He relates virtu to manliness, force, and ambition, while fortuna is described as a woman that must be conquered through brutality and audacity. The relation between politics and morality is discussed in terms of Machiavelli’s advices to rulers. Assigned Readings: • Machiavelli, The Prince (Selected parts) Additional Reading: • McClelland, “Machiavelli: The Prince and the Virtuous Republic”, pp. 149-167.
6 SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY I: THOMAS HOBBES AND THE LEVIATHAN Seen as a paradoxical thinker, Thomas Hobbes’ political thoughts are examined in the context of the emergence of modern state in the 17th century England. Even though Hobbes is a stern defender of political absolutism, he also insists upon the equality of human beings. As he maintains that state is a contract between individuals, state is obliged to protect the interests of the governed by assuring civil peace and security. Hobbes’ famous conceptualization of “state of nature” is examined by analyzing his political morality. Assigned Readings: • Hobbes, The Leviathan (Selected parts) Additional Reading: • McClelland, “Social Contract I: The Hobbesian Version”, pp. 191-227.
7 SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY II: JOHN LOCKE AND JEAN-JACQUES ROUSSEAU After introducing Locke’s life and works in a political-historical framework, his advocacy of natural equality of human beings and their natural rights to life, liberty, and property is examined. It is claimed that Locke transformed the ideas previously formulated by Machiavelli and Hobbes into a more liberal constitutional theory of the state. This lecture also introduces the life and works of Rousseau, as well as the historical context emerged in France after the death of Louis XIV. After examining his analysis of the origins of inequality, Rousseau’s version of social contract theory is examined via his conceptualization of “state of nature”, “civilization”, and “general will”. Assigned Readings: • Locke, Second Treatise on Civil Government (Selected parts) • Rousseau, The Social Contract (Selected parts) • Rousseau, Discourse on the Origin and the Foundations of Inequality Among Men (Selected parts) Additional Reading: • McClelland, “Social Contract II: The Lockian Version”, pp. 229-247; “Social Contract III: The Rousseauist Version”, pp. 249-274.
8 MONTESQUIEU AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS After introducing Montesquieu’s life and work, this lecture examines the principal concepts in Montesquieu’s famous work The Spirit of the Laws. His “climate theory”, his concept of “esprit générale”, and “separation of powers” are analyzed by emphasizing Montesquieu’s contribution to the emergence of modern state and rule of law. Assigned Readings: • Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws (Selected parts) Additional Reading: • McClelland, “Enlightenment and Government through Law: Montesquieu”, pp. 315-338.
9 ENLIGHTENMENT AND ITS CRITICS In this concluding lecture, Kant’s famous article “What is Enlightenment” is analyzed for laying bare the foundations of the Enlightenment thought. After tracing the impact of Kant’s arguments in the upcoming French Revolution, Edmund Burke’s “internal” criticism of the Enlightenment thought is examined via his merciless attack on the French Revolution. Assigned Readings: • Kant, “An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?” • Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Selected parts) Additional Reading: • Strauss and Cropsey (eds.), ‘Immanuel Kant’, in History of Political Philosophy, pp. 581-621. • McClelland, ‘The Limitations of Enlightenment: Hume and Burke’, in A History of Western Political Thought, pp. 401-424.
10 JOHN STUART MILL I: LIBERTY In this lecture, John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian philosophy is examined with reference to his seminal work On Liberty. Addressing the concept of the “tyranny of majority”, Mill’s conceptualization of “freedom of expression” and “freedom from harm” is discussed via contemporary political debates. Assigned Reading: • Mill, On Liberty (Selected parts)
11 JOHN STUART MILL 2: WOMEN’S RIGHTS In this lecture, the life and ideas of John Stuart Mill are analyzed in a connected fashion in the light of his Autobiography, while his defense of women’s rights is examined through his work The Subjection of Women. Assigned Reading: • Mill, The Subjection of Women (Selected parts)
12 FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND THE GENEALOGY OF MORALITY This lecture aims to introduce the main ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy. The concepts of “will to power”, “amor fati”, “eternal recurrence of the same”, and the “übermench” are discussed in connection with Nietzsche’s genealogy of morality, i.e. his distinction between “master” and “slave” moralities. Assigned Reading: • Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality (First Essay)
13 FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND THE GENEALOGY OF PUNISHMENT This lecture continues to discuss Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy through his genealogy of punishment. Referring to Michel Foucault’s The Birth of the Prison: Disicpline and Punish, Nietzsche’s genealogy of punishment is discussed as a precursor of modern sociology. Assigned Reading: • Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality (Second Essay)
14 General Evaluation of the Term Final Exam Final Exam


Dersin Program Çıktılarına Katkısı
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10
Ö1 5 5
Ö2 5 5
Ö3 5 5
Ö4 5
Ö5 5 5 5

Katkı Düzeyi: 1: Çok Düşük 2: Düşük 3: Orta 4: Yüksek 5: Çok Yüksek


https://obs.gedik.edu.tr/oibs/bologna/progCourseDetails.aspx?curCourse=158512&curProgID=5720&lang=tr